The Michigan Law Review’s companion journal First Impressions published an online symposium on the Supreme Court, the Federal Circuit, and Patent Law. The symposium is in light of recent Supreme Court decisions KSR v. Teleflex, Microsoft v. AT&T, and eBay v. MercExchange.
A diverse group of authors explores whether these cases, considered together, represent a recent upheaval in patent law and redefine the relationship between the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court or if such predictions are overblown.
Patent litigator Harold C. Wegner believes that the Microsoft case revealed the balkanized nature of the Federal Circuit and that KSR, through which the Supreme Court created a unified message, will therefore be crucial to the Federal Circuit under future Chief Judge Randal Rader.
Senior Vice President and General Counsel for Eli Lilly & Co. Robert A. Armitage proposes that Congress adopt the National Academy of Sciences’ recommendations for reforming patent law rather than pursuing “anti-troll” objectives and simultaneously defends the judiciary’s successful track record of responding to common criticisms of anti-trolls without legislative intervention.
Patent litigators Stephen G. Kunin and Andrew K. Beverina explain KSR’s effect on patent law and outline lessons that it suggests for patent prosecution and litigation.
To download a PDF of the entire symposium, please click here.
Additional First Impressions content is available here.